Autofocus Converted Contax N Test: 17-35mm f2.8
Contax N 17-35mm f2.8 v Nikon AFS 17-35mm f2.8
Performance at 24mm: f8 (Centre Frame)
|
|
|
Contax N 17-35mm at 24mm/f8 |
Nikon 17-35mm AFS at 24mm/f8 |
Canon 24mm f1.4 L / f8 |
0 points |
1 point |
2 points |
By f8, the Zeiss Contax has improved significantly centre frame, but the Canon L has moved to the next level, just edging out the Nikon zoom.
Performance at 24mm: f8 (10mm off-centre, right side)
|
|
|
Contax N 17-35mm at 24mm/f8 |
Nikon 17-35mm AFS at 24mm/f8 |
Canon 24mm f1.4 L / f8 |
1 point |
0 points |
2 points |
Performance at 24mm: f8 (Upper right corner)
|
|
|
Contax N 17-35mm at 24mm/f8 |
Nikon 17-35mm AFS at 24mm/f8 |
Canon 24mm f1.4 L / f8 |
0 points |
1 point |
2 points |
The really good news is that by 24mm / f8, the Contax lens has finally lost its annulus horribilis: the torus of reduced resolution that made comparison with the Nikon 17-35mm so difficult at shorter focal lengths. Until the Zeiss ZF 25mm arrives, it's tough to see how there is much margin for improvement, resolution-wise, in the Canon 24L at f8. The Nikon is very close behind.